Letters to the Editor

What's worse: Secondhand smoke or alcohol?

Down in Olympia, they have a problem. If they crack down on drunk drivers, they would have to build a new prison to house them, and that could cost millions of dollars. So they decided that it is cheaper to allow multiple DUIs. It’s just a misdemeanor, and after all, a lot of important people drive drunk.

But we must prosecute smokers (even though smoking is legal and we depend on the exorbitant taxation) because secondhand smoke kills. Yet secondhand alcohol kills much quicker –– and whole carloads at a time. It destroys families, orphans children, costs many millions of dollars in medical and insurance claims, and makes vagrants out of previously normal people.

So what’s the problem?

Marie Robinson

Federal Way

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the Oct 21
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates