Letters to the Editor

Reader has a beef with police blotter | Federal Way letters

I have a beef about the way the first item in the May 11 police blotter was written. It was about a woman seeing a man masturbating in a car in public. The woman called 911. My problem is the last sentence, which says “The report did not mention whether the man was also texting.”

Really? Is this funny? How about an item about the rape of a woman and the last sentence asking if the man was wearing boxers or briefs? That is the equivalent insensitive comment.

I don’t know who writes these police blotters — the newspaper or the police. Was this wording that the police department used in its report? If so, I have an even bigger beef with them.

Lois Deusen, Federal Way

Editor’s note: The police are innocent in this situation.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the Oct 21
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates