Letters to the Editor

Pedestrian safety seems expensive | Federal Way letters

Mary Paterson beat me to it (“Pedestrian islands waste city’s money,” letters, Jan. 26). I too was wondering about who authorized the construction and why they need to construct these pedestrian crossings on South 320th Street. I am all for safety, but painting crosswalk lines just a few feet away at the intersection would do the same job and would be a lot cheaper.

An intersection, even if not marked, is considered an unmarked crosswalk, which gives the pedestrian the right of way. To the motorist who may not be familiar with this, I suggest that people read RCW 46.61.235 and RCW 46.61.240.

It may be too late now for the two I noticed on South 320th Street, but I hope that a little more research goes into projects such as this to determine if there is a more economical way of achieving the end.

Harry M. Reichenberg, Federal Way

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the Oct 21
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates