News

Sides taken on Triangle project

By ERICA HALL

Staff writer

Funding for a road improvement project to fix the Triangle — a convergence of three major highways near Federal Way — could be on unsure footing, so south King County and Federal Way leaders are banding together to make sure the powers-that-be know how strongly they feel about the project.

Local leaders are also pushing to keep the original budget amount intact — the Regional Transportation Improvement District (RTID) suggested cuts out of concern voters wouldn’t approve a larger package — and for fair distribution of available funding to ensure denser areas, like Seattle, don’t get the lion’s share of revenue.

This year’s recommendation by the RTID to cut the budget, eliminating $200 million from south King County’s share, concerns local officials. As it turns out, the amount needed to build the Triangle project in Federal Way is about $200 million.

In addition, there was local concern that several members of the SCAT (South County Area Transportation) Board joined forces to push for other projects at the expense of the Triangle. Auburn Mayor Pete Lewis, board chairman, said that never happened.

Federal Way city manager David Moseley pointed out the Triangle project is still on the list, but he suggested local leaders mobilize to make sure it remains there.

Moseley met with Lewis Thursday afternoon to discuss projects in south King County. “We agreed all the projects on the SCAT list are equally important,” Lewis said. “This recommendation is the minimum possible and must be completed as a package. Either we get the list done, or SCAT won’t be able to recommend projects to RTID.”

Still, at a regional transportation meeting held April 14, city council members, state Reps. Skip Priest and Mark Miloscia, state Sen. Tracey Eide, chamber of commerce members and others agreed to begin lobbying RTID board members for the Triangle project.

Eide expressed a concern that, at the moment, “Federal Way is standing alone.”

Moseley said the city might have better luck working with Pierce County. Kent, Auburn and Renton probably won’t help Federal Way, he said, and the Metropolitan King County Council delegation tends to break up geographically.

Priest said Federal Way leaders should point out voters here will be aware of the fairness issue when the project list hits the ballot in November.

“We’ve been required again and again to take a significant amount of growth. We should continue to make the point that concurrency is a valid principle and the Triangle project addresses concurrency,” he said. “If concurrency is not met, I don’t see the point of supporting the electorate. It’ll be harder for us to make the case than it would be if an important project that’s already going was moving ahead.

“There’s a point where those of us who have been on the leading edge of voting for infrastructure improvements will want to see equity prevail.”

While Councilwoman Linda Kochmar offered to draft a letter from city officials and the Chamber of Commerce asking RTID board members to support the Triangle project, she lamented the uncertainty of funding for Federal Way projects despite the city’s size.

“We’re the eighth-largest city in the state, the fourth in King County. They don’t know who we are,” she said.

“Yes they do,” Eide replied. “And if they don’t, they will.”

Staff writer Erica Hall: 925-5565, ehall@fedwaymirror.com

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Jul 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.